SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (1801)1/17/2001 11:18:36 PM
From: Theophile  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 46821
 
Ron,I simply have the obvious facts to deal with.

Please do not put into my writing your beliefs; if costs were justifiable, they would have been allowable. Instead, the utes chose to go through the back door and rack up bills and *then* use that as a reason to need higher rates. Nobody stopped the utes from upgrading, nobody forced them to buy expensive electricity; why did they not begin blackouts earlier? To set the stage with massive debt and force the hysteria...upgrade expenses could have been included in rate hikes as well.

As I stated previously, if there is a legitimate bill to pay, it would be paid. The bill was illegitimate, and now the muscle of accrued debt (to whom was this money paid will be the next subject of scrutiny, if the watchdogs are not yet on the ute payroll) is being used to drag a red-herring across the stage.

Whenever I see hysteria, hype and politics, I am reminded of how political scams are carried out: Hysteria is the key here, and as I view the Media attempting to create more hysteria I am more convinced of the illegitimacy of the situation.
Regards,
Martin Thomas



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (1801)1/18/2001 7:55:54 PM
From: Srexley  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 46821
 
"And btw, since when do "the people" suddenly have the right, through the power of the vote, to force a company into operating at a loss?"

This is the point I just tried to make regarding and earlier vote in CA about insurance rates. You make the point better than I do.

As far as judging this debate, I'm with you, Ron. I also feel it is on topic. Frank's thread wanders around a bit, and that is good.
Scott