To: FreedomForAll who wrote (4326 ) 2/19/2001 1:14:08 PM From: Jonathan Schonsheck Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4342 Paracelsian Announces Decision Dismissing Suit ITHACA, N.Y., Feb. 19 /PRNewswire/ -- Paracelsian, Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: PRLN - news) ITHACA, N.Y., announced today that the Hadyk, et al. V. John G. Babish, et a., case that was commenced in the New York State Supreme Court in June 1993 by certain persons against Paracelsian was dismissed. This case was commenced in New York State Supreme Court (Onondaga County) in June 1993 by certain persons, individually and doing business as In Vitro Bioanalytic Systems, against the Company, Dr. John G. Babish, a former officer and director of the Company, and Edward Heslop, a founding shareholder of the Company, primarily as an action for money damages and injunctive relief against the Company for alleged misappropriation of proprietary information and unfair competition. The plaintiffs alleged, among other things, that in 1990, prior to the Company's incorporation, a partnership had been formed with Messrs. Babish and Heslop to commercialize products that the Company was developing. By decision dated September 14, 1994, the Court dismissed certain of the plaintiffs' claims against the Company while permitting a claim alleging unfair competition to proceed. The Company had filed a motion for summary judgment, and a three-week trial had been scheduled to begin on March 26, 2001. ``The Company believed that the suit against it was without merit and was defending the case vigorously,'' said Dr. T. Colin Campbell, President & CEO of Paracelsian. ``We are pleased that the Court dismissed all claims against Paracelsian and its codefendants. We can now put this behind us, so that we can continue to focus our efforts on bringing our products and services to market in a timely manner,'' continued Dr. Campbell. Paracelsian's attorney Paul Wagner of Brown, Pinnisi & Michaels, stated this about the Court's dismissal of the case: ``We are very pleased that the Court not only exonerated Paracelsian of any wrongdoing, but also rejected the plaintiffs' fundamental premise that they had a property interest in the technology at issue in this case. Once that premise was properly removed, plaintiffs' entire case was without merit.'' Paracelsian is a unique biotechnology company with three primary areas of focus. Paracelsian develops technologies useful in the detection and monitoring of environmental contaminants such as dioxin. Second, Paracelsian develops functional bioassays, which are the basis of its BioFIT(TM) Quality Assurance program for herbs, botanicals and other dietary supplements. And finally, Paracelsian's Internet business leverages extensive relationships in China, along with expertise in nutritional science, to provide an exchange of unique health products and research services.