SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: AllansAlias who wrote (59581)1/18/2001 11:01:01 PM
From: Lucretius  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 436258
 
yea, those commercials are always wrong -g-



To: AllansAlias who wrote (59581)1/19/2001 9:59:12 AM
From: Perspective  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 436258
 
Gapped straight over that last downtrend line. The only one remaining is THE downtrend for the whole big bad bear. If it takes us a little while to interact with it, it would occur below 3500. There's nothing to guarantee we get that high, but again, salivating if it should happen. Neutral here and will remain so until the orgy shows signs of yielding. I thought earnings would be a negative event (my big mistake), with a rally coming after the news cleared out. Evidently, it's just too much for the collosally stupid fund managers to sit on the month's inflows. Too much fun to burn the OPM. So we buy the bad earnings, the dismal forecasts, and the supposed second Fed easing. I think the excitement should actually end pretty quickly. Looking for a test of 3K to fail, setting up one last hurrah that might go so far as to interact with the big downtrend line. Then we get back to da bear. Seasonals are still providing some clues here, just subtract a little to allow for the downtrend, and multiply by 3 for the lunatics running the financial futures of our retirement accounts. Those seasonals turn very negative at the end of next month.

BC



To: AllansAlias who wrote (59581)1/19/2001 10:02:45 AM
From: Perspective  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 436258
 
Interesting. What would it mean if we gapped up and over, only to fall back underneath this important TL? (No need to answer that one by the way - just rhetorical <GGGGGGG>)

Boy, I like the way this test is shaping up...

BC