To: epicure who wrote (1771 ) 1/19/2001 7:34:17 PM From: Lane3 Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486 I've been quietly following this discussion about the suitability of non-parents to shepherd kids. I'd just like to throw in a different perspective FWIW. My circle of friends includes a number of men and women who, like me, never had kids. Many of them do volunteer work with kids--coaching and tutoring mostly. Tutoring/mentoring underprivileged kids is common among people I know. I don't do it. The prospect of spending more than ten minutes with one kid, let alone a group of them, would leave me standing in a puddle. But they like being around kids. They miss their nieces and nephews who live out of town or think that kids keep you young or they just want to give something back. I never gave their volunteer work a second thought until I read all these posts. So I mentioned this discussion to a couple of them. While they appreciated the wariness, their reaction was surprise that their contribution would be dismissed out of hand. They made the point that they have the time and energy to deal with the kids and can take a load off the parents. I'm certain that there's nothing sinister about their interest. A few years ago a colleague asked me to consider being a chaperone with her for a trip to Australia. Her church group of young, black, Catholic teenagers had won some sort of prize. She well knew that I was white, an athiest, and not a parent. She asked me because she knew I was well traveled, a good sport, and able to afford the trip. I'm sure she also knew I wouldn't agree to go. But it could never have occurred to her that I was a risk to her kids. I know that the rejection of possible volunteers is not the point here. The kids definitely come first. I know, too, that I don't have the special perspective of a parent. It just seems to me a shame to throw the baby out with the bathwater, as someone on this thread has been saying lately. Like I said, FWIW. Karen