SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (1907)1/21/2001 1:26:55 PM
From: Poet  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 82486
 
Good afternoon, GZ,

Well, I certainly understand that you didn't intend to make a silly post here. <g>

It does interest me, though, why you've suddenly become interested in "providing helpful data to the ongoing discussion" here after making the following comments on the RWEP:

To: jlallen who wrote (2756)
From: GROUND ZERO
Saturday, Jan 20, 2001 7:20 PM ET
Reply # of 2905

Let's see... did you miss anything over at the left wing outhouse... hmmm... well, never a word ever mentioned there
about Jesse Jackson and his illegitimate millions of babies he's produced all over the place... but they did have a
lengthy discussion led by X and one or two other posters about how masturbation should be taught in schools as
part of the regular curriculum... other than that, you missed nothing critical.....<g>

GZ


and

o: James McGowan who wrote (2831)
From: GROUND ZERO
Saturday, Jan 20, 2001 7:24 PM ET
Reply # of 2905

Yeah, I guess it's pretty obvious.....<g> I don't waste any of my time there anymore, after more than a week of
trying to reason with the noisy ones, I realized I can't discuss Shakespeare with infants.....

GZ


So, GZ, I'm interested in your statement that Jesse Jackson has fathered millions of illegitimate babies all over the place. He must be a very busy man, huh? Or was that hyberbole? You can always choose to go back to the RWET and discuss shakespeare over there....though I haven't seen anything on that thread approaching such intellectual rigor.