SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Poet who wrote (1919)1/21/2001 1:55:07 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
I wonder what we should have discussed about Jesse Jackson? Does anyone think what he did was a good thing? Now if more people were masturbating fewer people would be having babies. I say we encourage men and women of all ages to masturbate more.

I never saw anyone try to discuss Shakespeare here. I have a special interest in the Bard of Avon.

One of my favorite plays is Twelfth Night, followed by Much Ado about Nothing, and As You Like IT. Lear is magnificent, but so very sad and on target for human frailty- it is a difficult play to watch. Henry the V and the Tempest are also wonderful. I always felt Titus Andronicus was the perfect Shakespeare play to be made into a movie for the modern generations weaned on Friday the 13th part XXX, but it should have been directed by Wes Craven, and not Taymor.



To: Poet who wrote (1919)1/21/2001 2:30:44 PM
From: Rambi  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 82486
 
Poet,

I was reading the RW thread, but am stopping because I'm finding that the peculiar obsession with LWers, particularly X, to be strange and upsetting. GZ has recently posted, not only misquoting X's heroin comment,(changing best painkiller to just best) but also implying that she is a substance abuser. I have no idea where heroin falls on the hierarchy of effective painkillers, but while there were many responses eager to insult X and the LWers stand on drugs or masturbation, none offered a single scientific rebuttal or intelligent response.

There's some pretty nasty stuff about X, and this desire to demean and hurt her borders on obsessive.

He writes:
...funny that I saw that same post about heroine (sic) being 'the best' and I just posted that comment on this thread as you posted your comments to me...<g> such a position on drugs can be well understood within the context of a poster attempting to justify his/her own drug and substance abuse...



To: Poet who wrote (1919)1/21/2001 6:07:29 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Hi Poet,

Very simple... I thought providing an informative site might add to your discussion... does there always have to be a hidden agenda? If providing an informative site is not needed in your discussions, just say so and none will be provided.....

TIA

Best Regards,

GZ