SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rambi who wrote (1932)1/21/2001 3:21:27 PM
From: Poet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Hi Rambi,

Yes, I've been reading the RWET with increasing dismay over the past few days, and for the same reasons you've mentioned. Calling X a "vagitarian" because of her stance on sexual issues and insinuating that she is "a pot head" and a drug abuser because of her stance on drug abuse are ad hominem insults from small, mean minds with little ability to discuss the topics at hand.

I don't like it either, not one bit.



To: Rambi who wrote (1932)1/21/2001 4:46:15 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
There's some pretty nasty stuff about X, and this desire to demean and hurt her borders on obsessive.

She got there the old fashioned way. She earned it. JLA



To: Rambi who wrote (1932)1/21/2001 6:18:10 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston  Respond to of 82486
 
Rambi

I like being accurately represented or quoted and X does not, as you say, imply "heroin is the best". None of the masturbation stuff is fairly commented on either. The mere existence of the LWP and the RWET says we are weary and wounded by this election. I'm not sure how a boxing ring and no gloves will ever lead to any civil discussions, ....but it was not my idea.