SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : JDS Uniphase (JDSU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pat mudge who wrote (16860)1/23/2001 10:23:47 AM
From: Tunica Albuginea  Respond to of 24042
 
Pat, buy retailers

Message 15226901

TA



To: pat mudge who wrote (16860)1/23/2001 10:35:14 AM
From: Tunica Albuginea  Respond to of 24042
 
Pat on the other hand, evaluate JDSU investment potential with StockEvaluator

sfgate.com

and forget retailers,

:)

stockbook.com

Go to Stock Evaluator

stockbook.com

Insert JDSU , hit ignition and
look at 3 - 4 week performance.

Is this a Lamborghini or what?

:-)

TA



To: pat mudge who wrote (16860)1/23/2001 11:00:25 AM
From: Tunica Albuginea  Respond to of 24042
 
OTOTOT, Pat,please clarify: are you asking we bail out CA? VBG!!!

:)

I just want to know where we are heading with this
before getting more specific,

:-)

TA



To: pat mudge who wrote (16860)1/23/2001 12:16:03 PM
From: Tunica Albuginea  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 24042
 
OTOT/California, to bail them out or not to bail them out:
Assuming CA has contributed to ~12% of GDP, the
question is...how much did The Nation give to CA in terms of:

-Medicare Welfare ( Medicare is a welfare system, )

-Medicaid subsidies

-Disability subsidies

-immigrants having their Medicare paid off, when they never
started paying into the system early on, and did not
contribute to it

-other subsidies

etc

Maybe one of our more knowledgable SI threaders on
the ins and outs of Welfare subsidies can help...

my point: did the nation already perhaps gave to CA,
more then CA gave us?

So that, if CA comes cup in hand, we can say

" we already gave ...."

:-)

TA@LookinAtTheDynamicsOf.com



To: pat mudge who wrote (16860)1/23/2001 1:05:41 PM
From: Kayaker  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 24042
 
OT - Darn fine folks those British Columbians...

Emergency Power Seen Averting California Blackouts
Tuesday January 23 12:01 PM ET

By James Jelter

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Californians started the day on Tuesday with another blast of warnings to conserve precious megawatts, though state officials said they believed they had rounded up enough electricity to squeak through the day without triggering new blackouts.

Officials at the California Independent System Operator (news - web sites) (ISO), after warning blackouts would be likely by mid-morning, suddenly changed their tune when emergency hydroelectric supplies were made available from British Columbia....



To: pat mudge who wrote (16860)1/23/2001 6:03:08 PM
From: Tunica Albuginea  Respond to of 24042
 
OT/Wall Street Jour: Brown and Out in Beverly Hills

January 23, 2001

Review & Outlook

interactive.wsj.com

Brown and Out in Beverly Hills
===================================


The comedy is almost too broad to bear.

In the past month, the country's showcase state has come to look like
a hapless banana republic.

California's two largest utilities have defaulted on their debts and
watched their credit ratings sink into junk territory; mighty businesses
have been reduced to running on backyard generators and laying off workers.
People have been stranded on elevators. And of course this is America,
so there are law suits:
San Francisco is suing power wholesalers,
the utilities are suing both the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
and the Public Utility Commission, and the power suppliers are about to
take the utilities into bankruptcy court.

Our own fave scene was out of a bumper car ride when blackouts caused
traffic lights to stand, well, powerless while cars crashed into
one another at intersections.

The most seriously pathetic players in all this are the politicians.
Particularly Governor Gray Davis.
He didn't get it last summer when the trouble began.
He didn't get it last month when the problems multiplied,
and he still doesn't get it.


Not only did Mr. Davis accuse out-of-state power suppliers of being
"pirates" and "marauders,"
but he has proposed making the withholding of power a criminal act and
suggested committing public lands to power plant construction "
on the condition that energy be distributed only in California."

And then there was his trip to Washington to plead (successfully)
for the Clinton Administration to compel suppliers to sell to California
utilities and ask FERC to impose price caps on power sold in the Western power grid.

He has also signed a law
to block utilities from selling their power plants and forcing them
to sell that power only in California at "reasonable rates."
Currently, he is pushing a scheme whereby the state would buy,
at long-term contract, power at $55 per megawatt hour
-- probably below the cost of production --
and certainly way below current market prices.


Basic Problem One:

supply.


There is a wicked mismatch between the power demanded by Californians
and the power supplied. During the past several years,
California's economy has boomed and zoomed while its power generation has languished.
But the Alfred E. Neuman state has just assumed that its neighbors
would make up the difference.
No more.
States like Oregon and Washington have had three years of
unusually dry weather and are loath to ship hydroelectric power to their profligate
neighbor when their own needs are growing.

Of course there is no way to suddenly create the additional juice that California needs,
especially when strict environmental laws along with restrictive siting
and permitting regulations demanded by community groups mean
it takes six to seven years to build a power plant.
But it doesn't help to have the Governor calling suppliers pirates.
And it is not at all helpful to force them to sell to utilities verging on bankruptcy.
And it surely isn't helpful to demand price controls on what they do sell.
What potential supplier wants to commit capital for a project that involves
such a long and risky process when his or her return is so uncertain?

Basic Problem Two:

demand.

There is no nice way to say this. California's misnamed "deregulation" scheme
is beyond stupid.


Four years ago, a Democratic legislature, a Republican Governor,
the benighted utilities and the usual rabid consumer groups agreed to a plan
that freed prices in the wholesale market but kept them fixed at retail.

Since demand is driven by the retail market and consumers are insulated from price changes,
there is no mechanism to generate a market response to price changes.

When energy prices started going up, consumers had no incentive to curtail usage.
And they didn't. All of which left the utilities paying a monthly average wholesale price
of more than $200 per megawatt hour, but only able to charge its customers $54;


hence the utilities are stuck with almost $13 billion of unpaid bills to date.

Last month, the state legislature passed a bill allowing temporary rate increases
of 7% to 15%, way short of the 30% increase necessary to close the gap.

(We might mention that there is another way to reduce demand,
one California seems to be cleaving to now:

chase the demanders out.

Brownouts, blackouts and general uncertainty have already induced
businesses to switch production to other states where more reliable power
can be had. Now that's conservation!)

Basic Problem Three:

blame.

If California can't correctly locate the blame for its problems, it can't solve them.

Despite what its politicians think, this is not a federal problem.


It is their problem. Tomorrow, the new Secretary of Energy must decide
whether to renew the order compelling suppliers to sell to the nearly bankrupt utilities.
We hope he tells California to get serious about its problems.
After all, it shouldn't be too-too hard for a state that gave us
the Beverly Hills diet to figure this one out.

------------------------------------------------------------