SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (47420)1/29/2001 8:49:41 AM
From: GVTucker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77400
 
And there's more. From Bloomberg this morning:

"I have said that in economies that are growing reasonably, (Cisco) will grow 30 to 50 percent," Chambers said Sunday at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. "In economies that slow, we will go below 30 to 50 percent. And we may go negative if it's a slowdown that's very rough, that lasts a long period of time."

Now this would seem to me to be just normal cautious statements. But there's a kicker in the next paragraph:

When asked whether Chambers' comments implied that San Jose, California-based Cisco may miss that target this fiscal year, which ends in July, spokeswoman Abby Smith said, "you could infer that."



To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (47420)1/29/2001 9:24:41 AM
From: Stock Farmer  Respond to of 77400
 
Mucho - in any capitalistic economy, business growth is at the mercy of customers.

Anyone who thinks otherwise should not be investing. When customers decide to slow spending, they slow spending.

This translates into lower revenues and slower, neutral or negative growth for their suppliers. Like CSCO. Not much the company can do about it but ride out the storm.

CSCO price has retreated from assuming it would experience glorious hypergrowth for a generation or two. But it's still got about a decade built in at current prices.

Time will tell.

This whole market is goofy. I'm still in my bunker.

John.



To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (47420)1/29/2001 9:57:08 AM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 77400
 
Actually, you are incorrect. If you've listened to any of the last 3 months of interviews with Chambers, he's been saying the same thing. If the economy slows, Cisco will not be immune to that slowdown. I don't know where you get your facts, but they are erroneous.