Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Srexley who wrote (124307)	1/29/2001 8:46:56 PM
From: SecularBull	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

I'm not debating that point. The water had become so muddy that the USSC had to take an unpopular action. The final FLSC ruling was not flawed, imho, in the fact that they wanted to conduct a recount, but rather that the time was running out. Also, and maybe just as important, the FLSC ruling did not apply a standard for all votes to be counted. They could have completed the counts as ordered, imho. However the standard would have been non-standardized. Yet, does this warrant the USSC's ultimate determination on the grounds cited? It's weak. There is no doubt this whole thing was a clusterf*%#. LoF