Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (3938)	1/30/2001 9:29:40 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

You can force people to do almost anything to avoid starvation- I do not consider that a choice. It is more of a biological imperative- to call it a "choice" seems dishonest to me.

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (3938)	1/30/2001 9:42:15 AM
From: hobo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I agree that it may not be much of a choice. Still, if I have the choice of starving or not starving, my choice is going to be "not starving" every single time. sounds clearly logical to me.... so would you be able to explain to me this.... when it comes to "job quality" etc etc etc... there seems to be no problem with most people that so long jobs are provided, it is "good for the people, regardless of other factors, once you consider the "big picture"... sounds logical to me... however... imagine the POWER of influence on the people the church has... that when it comes to family planning, and contraception... ALL LOGIC goes out the window, and they keep having children as this would also.... be "part of the big picture" ? why is it "OK" for the church and its policies to go against clear logic ? clear logic being... providing sex education, family planning, and even abortion in the face of the situation where people are reproducing like rabbits and perpetuating the "BIG PICTURE" situation every day .... arrrgghhh i am sounding like a broken record.