Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (4163)	1/31/2001 4:15:56 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

But I do want to clarify and state I believe there are rare instances where I would make exceptions. For example, an indigent who becomes pregnant and who's life is threatened by a pregnancy. I would support tax moneys being utilized in such a case. But only once. This is going to sound like I am making an argument against my own position but I'm really just trying to examine yours in greater detail. If the indigent's life threatening pregnancy was caused by rape and then she got pregnant again from rape and it threatened her life again (perhaps she has a condition that causes any pregnancy to be life threatening) would you support public funding of the second abortion? Tim