Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (131201)	1/31/2001 5:45:59 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572102

Tim By this I am assuming Ted Kennedy Democrats. I don't think in those terms...T. Kennedy Demo. I am not even sure what it means. All the Democrats who are fat? It was in Joe's post. If Clinton intends to govern according to his own ideas rather then those of the Democrats, then having liberal cabinet members would just get in the way. If he intends to govern according to what the Democrats want then he should have either changed parties or not bothered to run. If he governs as a Democrat he will lose the next election by a landslide if he even bothers to run because the Democrats will prefer the real thing rather then the imitation, and the Republicans will not provide much support to some one that governs as a liberal. First not all Democrats are liberal...just as not all Republicans are conservative. Forgetting all that though, if its so impossible, why did he suggest the concept when he and Gore were haggling over FLA? Just more of his weasel ways? ted