Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (125298)	2/4/2001 4:09:54 PM
From: aknahow	Respond to of 769667

You are doing more damage to the concept than those that asked the question. When you say 100% goes to feed the hungry because the overhead is 25% that is a big mistake. If you had said 75% goes to feed the hungry that would have been fine with me. Expenses are expenses. Now when you tell me the funds are sent to other organizations which distribute the food i end up wondering how much of an expense burden they have. Still like the idea but think that others have done a better job about thinking about potential abuse. Its the sort of neat idea which many if not most would find no reason to question. The questions are not poor questions, so far your answers have been IMO inadequate.

To: E who wrote (125298)	2/4/2001 4:09:54 PM
From: aknahow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

You are doing more damage to the concept than those that asked the question. When you say 100% goes to feed the hungry because the overhead is 25% that is a big mistake. If you had said 75% goes to feed the hungry that would have been fine with me. Expenses are expenses. Now when you tell me the funds are sent to other organizations which distribute the food i end up wondering how much of an expense burden they have. Still like the idea but think that others have done a better job about thinking about potential abuse. Its the sort of neat idea which many if not most would find no reason to question. The questions are not poor questions, so far your answers have been IMO inadequate.