SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zardoz who wrote (63325)2/5/2001 1:28:20 AM
From: goldsheet  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 116752
 
Just use the ignore function, works great, less GATA <g>



To: Zardoz who wrote (63325)2/5/2001 1:31:53 AM
From: d:oug  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116752
 
... I know the truth about gold & manipulation.
... have offered to sell such information to GATA
... any "COURT" cases they bring will only be proven
to be libelous against them. Hutch

ok,
hutch-chew BubbleGum
and not that tobacco chew stuff i hope. :o) no gazoonie tight

okokok
sorry folks
ok4 lets get serious

and since hutch will not return 4 a month
and his dragon profile will not melt Frosty the Snowman
then hear here what i write
loud & clear
4 all ears

as hutch has spoken the following
... I know the truth about gold & manipulation.

Think i do that hutch has a concept of manipulation
that will reside in the Not_World or No_Reality
or mayB in that Bird_Land where at the same
place and time manipulation is everywhere
and nowhere and everything and nothing.

We could ask hutch when he obtained this TruTh.

hutch did say it was a long time ago.

We could ask hutch the payment required when he tried
to sell such information to GATA, a long time ago.

We could have seened this coming from hutch,
a long time ago.

But then, starting a long time ago,
hutch told us we have not a clue.

You could re-read hutch's post, that this is a reply to,
but you will see that its just another cut & paste
of those when he started posting a long time ago.

hutch knows
but will not tell us
will not tell us what he knows
is it because we don't know
what hutch knows
that hutch will not tell us
since that would mean that we would know
what hutch knows
and then hutch would not know
what we do not know
and then hutch would know
that he would not be able to tell us
yes,
we do not know
so
sew
sow
i really do know that hutch wants to know
what we do not know
but i know that what hutch wants to know
he does not know
only wants to know

ak



To: Zardoz who wrote (63325)2/5/2001 1:43:52 AM
From: grusum  Respond to of 116752
 
Hutch,

Please don't go back into hiding. There are many of us 'lurkers' out here who never, or almost never post that value your contributions. You shouldn't need to defend yourself, only your ideas... which you do a good job of. In order to come to a sound decision, one needs much perspective and solid info. You make a strong case for your 'side'. And i have learned much from reading your posts. Please keep duking it out with the opposition, as your efforts are enlightening to many (such as me).

Personal attacks only reveal much about the attacker, they reveal nothing about the person being attacked.

This is a much more interesting and informative thread with you posting.



To: Zardoz who wrote (63325)2/5/2001 7:23:46 AM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116752
 
NOW, though, with the South African miners in the same corner GATA(for the first time) has the chance to really move gold price to the + side. If they take their contributions & pay the miners to NOT MINE!



To: Zardoz who wrote (63325)2/5/2001 11:03:17 AM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 116752
 
from most actives
OT(?)
siliconinvestor.com



To: Zardoz who wrote (63325)2/10/2001 8:09:42 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 116752
 
We'll miss you hutch...

Come and hang out the Currency thread... I'd enjoy seeing your comments over there..

Subject 20640

Regards,

Ron



To: Zardoz who wrote (63325)2/14/2001 10:20:29 AM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 116752
 
Note use of word "conspiracy"
Message 15350232