Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Shread who wrote (41990)	2/5/2001 10:52:22 AM
From: donald sew	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 42787

Paul, >>>> Agree with you on "faux" wedges, Don; I haven't seen a single perfectly formed wedge on this advance, <<<< What really surpises me where so many are calling this RISING WEDGE a BEARISH WEDGE is that its breaking an important rule where its just not rising on declining volume. This is just text-book stuff. Im not saying that Im 100% sure that the NDX cant go lower, but an just saying that Im surprised how some are just ignoring basic rules and then hold a firm position rather than a position of uncertaintee. Keep in mind, before I get blasted by some, that I am specificly speaking about the rising wedge without declining volume, and not other issues. So Im not questioning those who expect the NAZ to go lower on other issues, just questioning the quality of the analysis where one is making a strong negative conclusion mainly on the rising wedge.