SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don England who wrote (86425)2/6/2001 12:38:44 AM
From: Gottfried  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
Don, OT *** Hickey's math is lacking. He says >You're seeing companies like Intel (INTC:Nasdaq - news), which looks like it might be cheap because it's dropped in half, selling now at almost 40 times estimated earnings -- 40 times!

Intel earned $1.51 so trailing P/E is 23+ now.
Historic PE quicken.com

Glaring errors like that make me suspicious of the rest of his statements. But, it made me look things up. :)

And, this business of assigning a PE to an index like Nasdaq makes little sense. Many NAZ companies have zero or negative earnings. It makes as much sense as saying "on average each of 50 people is worth $1B" when you have Bill Gates and 49 bums in the same room.

Regards
Gottfried



To: Don England who wrote (86425)2/6/2001 1:07:49 AM
From: Gottfried  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
Don, OT *** looked for the newsletter but could not find it. What I did find is an April '00 TSC article that is eerie in how well the analyst predicted the NAZ fall.
thestreet.com

Gottfried - that's all folks