Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Pro Choice Action Team -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (143)	2/7/2001 2:26:20 AM
From: Rambi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 948

E, You know, too, the people who started this thread weren't claiming that they held some ultimate truth or that they even agreed on all the different aspects of the issue; the header and repeated requests made it clear that any conflict should be taken to the Boxing thread because this thread was for people who were basically pro-choice to SOME degree and didn't want to rehash the same ground. On that basis, Doug is wrong about this thread-- there was NOT plenty of mud to go around; the visitors today greedily hogged the whole darn mudhole and they were slathered in filth from head to foot. Of course, I didn't really have much time to roll in the dirt with them, I was too busy with my cyber lovers, as I'm sure all of us real married women were. Bet you thought no one knew about your 17 abortions this year. They're on to us evil, cheatin' hussies. They know that we want that abortion available so that when we get pregnant during our multitudinous affairs (I've had at least 22) we can get right out there again for the next one without missing a day. These guys either have really strange relationships with their spouses or they're listening to too much country and western radio. Or maybe they are just indulging in wishful thinking.