SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (132233)2/9/2001 6:14:45 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570591
 
Ten,

But I do think Bush will do a great job balancing the budget.

Yea Reagan did a great job balancing the budget, and Bush is emulating Reagan's highly successful approach.

I'll bet you trust mathematics for your personal finances. I'm surprised that you are willing to accept Voodoo as the basis for the nation's accounting.

And I don't believe his tax cut will cause the sky to fall all-of-a-sudden, despite the frenzied objections from Democrats.

Of course not. It takes several years for the effects of an imbalanced budget to kick in. Reagan/Bush got away with it for 12 years before Perot came along and kicked the nation out of it's coma.

Scumbria



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (132233)2/11/2001 3:28:35 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570591
 
Scumbria, <I was talking about the environment and the budget.>

For the record, I don't think Bush should be touching the ANWR. But I do think Bush will do a great job balancing the budget. And I don't believe his tax cut will cause the sky to fall all-of-a-sudden, despite the frenzied objections from Democrats


Ten,

Most non partisan economists do not think we need a tax cut even if it were possible to implement in full this year....which it is not......in fact, it won't be fully implemented for 9 years.

So what do YOU think is the real reason that Bush is calling for a tax cut?

ted