SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Left Wing Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Poet who wrote (3948)2/10/2001 11:49:21 AM
From: Mighty_MezzRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 6089
 
Despite his aw shucks style, Reagan found virtually every anticommunist action justified,
no matter how brutal. From his eight years in the White House, there is no historical
indication that he was troubled by the bloodbath and even genocide that occurred in
Central America during his presidency, while he was shipping hundreds of millions of
dollars in military aid to the implicated forces.

The death toll was staggering -- an estimated 70,000 or more political killings in El
Salvador, possibly 20,000 slain from the contra war in Nicaragua, about 200 political
"disappearances" in Honduras and some 100,000 people eliminated during a
resurgence of political violence in Guatemala.

The one consistent element in these slaughters was the overarching Cold War
rationalization, emanating in large part from Ronald Reagan's White House.

Yet, as the world community moves to punish war crimes in the former Yugoslavia and
Rwanda, no substantive discussion has occurred in the United States about facing up to
this horrendous record of the 1980s.

Rather than a debate about Reagan as a potential war criminal, the ailing ex-president is
honored as a conservative icon with his name attached to Washington National Airport
and with an active legislative push to have his face carved into Mount Rushmore.
consortiumnews.com



To: Poet who wrote (3948)2/10/2001 11:54:40 AM
From: Mac Con UlaidhRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 6089
 
Interesting. I always multiply by ten and subtract the number I am multiplying 9 by. 50-5=45, 60-6=54, and so on.