Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (132528)	2/12/2001 2:44:32 PM
From: hmaly	Respond to of 1570564

Ted. Re..We know who won the popular votes but we will never know who won the electoral votes because of the Sup. Ct's intercession. << I would suggest that we know who won the electorial votes because all of FL. electorial votes were cast for GW on the 28th of Dec. 2000. Whether those electorial ballots represented the popular vote winner in FL. is in question, but the fact of how they were cast is a matter of record.

To: tejek who wrote (132528)	2/12/2001 3:10:37 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 1570564

Who got the most votes? Bush. Wrong! No its right. GW got the most electoral votes. We know who won the popular votes but we will never know who won the electoral votes because of the Sup. Ct's intercession. No GW did get the most electoral votes. He got FL's electoral votes. He also as far as can be told received the most popular votes in FL, but even if he did not he still received FL's electoral votes and thus the largest amount of electoral votes in the election. Tim

To: tejek who wrote (132528)	2/12/2001 3:16:34 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570564

RE:"We know who won the popular votes but we will never know who won the electoral votes because of the Sup. Ct's intercession." Wrong... Since then they have counted the undervotes in FL...Bush still won... Jim