SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (126723)2/12/2001 10:41:29 PM
From: RON BL  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
But Tom did you drink Kool Aid ? Remember reason and logic have to be abandoned at the alter of Bill Clinton.



To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (126723)2/12/2001 11:03:58 PM
From: ManyMoose  Respond to of 769667
 
That's a good one! For even more bear stories, see

Subject 50458



To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (126723)2/12/2001 11:19:35 PM
From: Little Joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Tom:

"CobaltBlue your conclusion. >>>Let's see, what do you call false statements made under oath while a defendant in a legal proceeding? which is a question of this statement."

I think Cobalt is technically correct. For example, I might testify that I saw Bill Smith do something. I may actually believe that that was true. If I am mistaken about his identity and testify that he did the deed, I haven't committed perjury, even though the statement is in fact false. This is in fact a germaine issue in a perjury trial.

Of course anyone who believes that Clinton did not know he was lying at the time the testimony was given, probably believes the check is in the mail.

Little joe



To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (126723)2/12/2001 11:41:16 PM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 769667
 
Correct me if I am wrong, but the false statement was that he did not engage in sex acts with Monica Lewinsky. If you leave out the issue of whether or not he was ever alone with Paula Jones, which he finessed by arguing that since they were in a hotel with many people, even though they were alone in a room with the door closed, they were not alone.

If you want to argue that "everyone lies about sex," that's one thing. But to argue that Clinton did not know that he was lying is . . . . common barnyard detritus.