Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (132637)	2/13/2001 1:45:34 PM
From: pgerassi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570915

Dear Tim: The most damage by any large explosive like a nuclear bomb is damage due to the shockwave created by the explosion. The impact of the shockwave decreases as the wave radiates outward. The impact thus, is proportional to the inverse of the square of the distance to the initial detonation. Thus to double the distance with the same impact requires 4 times the energy (actually somewhat more due to friction and other such damping effects). Hiroshima and Nagasaki were somewhat less than 20KT each and had a kill radius of about 2 miles (number pulled from a recent documentary). MIRV warheads are generally between 50 and 500KT or have kill radiuses of 3 and 10 miles. There exist nuclear warheads to 3MT or a kill radius of 24 miles. Thermonuclear ((D)ueterium-(T)ritium (isotopes of Hydrogen)) bombs exist to 100MT with 60MT being a typical size (largest ever exploded was a 57MT by the USSR). Thus, the 100MT DT bomb has a kill radius of about 140 miles. The largest designed is a 2GT bomb with a cobalt casing which was never built. This would have a kill radius of 630 miles but, the cobalt casing would turn into a highly radioactive isotope of Cobalt-60 with a half-life of 5 years and blow it evenly over the entire world. This would probably cause all unprotected people in the world to die of radiation poisoning (Cobalt is taken up into the body for use in bones, etc.). There probably is some order never to build it for the above reason. Most bombs in the inventories of all countries is in the MIRV sizes as they are highly reliable and low maintenance. The DT bombs have a high maintenance due to the short half life of Tritium (around 1 year IIRC). Pete

To: TimF who wrote (132637)	2/13/2001 1:46:42 PM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570915

Tim Re..You overestimate the effect of a single nuclear weapon a bit. First of all almost no nuclear weapons are more powerful then 20 megatons. A bomb of that size would destroy a large city and devastate its suburbs. <<<<< I believe I got that from a Scientific American article I read approx. 15 yrs ago. First of all, hydrogen bombs currently are smaller because mirved missiles do more destruction than I big bomb, but back in the early 60's; either they did exist or quite simply the article was using that as a theoretical example. <<<<<A 100MT bomb would effect a greater area then a 20MT, but less then 5 times as great because a larger % of the energy would be wasted on overkill in the center. 300 300 KT bombs would have less total yield then the 100MT monster you talk about but would be able to cause a lot more destruction.<<<<< To say that the area would be completely destroyed would be an exaggeration, but the article pointed out that all of those states would be set on fire if the bomb was exploded high enough; 5 miles, and the fires would be widespread enough to destroy the states. The explosion itself won't destry the states, but the heat generated would; if the bomb is exploded at the right height.