Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : NetCurrents NTCS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Teresa Lo who wrote (5689)	2/13/2001 3:09:33 PM
From: Teresa Lo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8925

P.S. Being Canadians, perhaps we are more humble, or did we get that way from being spanked by the market when we were in our Age of Infinite Wisdom?

To: Teresa Lo who wrote (5689)	2/13/2001 3:28:20 PM
From: SE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8925

You sure got spunk girl. Thanks for telling it like it is.....even if some don't wanna hear it. -Scott

To: Teresa Lo who wrote (5689)	2/13/2001 4:12:36 PM
From: Teresa Lo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8925

NO, NO, IT IS NOT!!!!! *"...not a subtle distinction; a true rising wedge is very bearish and predicts at best a retest of the lows, and almost always new lows..."* Well, we're there, if he says so himself. To:Michael Watkins who wrote (149) From: Paul Shread Tuesday, Feb 13, 2001 3:18 PM Respond to of 166 Michael, we'll probably never agree even partially on this, but I'll post once more on this to try to articulate my problems with the "wedge." First, any chart pattern is either a reaction against or reversal of the previous trend; therefore, it is important to see what forms off the low in a downtrend, or the high in an uptrend. Hence the reason that I don't think that lower line should be cast aside so lightly. Second, because it is a reaction or reversal, it is important to see what forms after the point where you begin the pattern; in this case, I get a steeper rising channel if I begin from the point where you did. cache.wsrn.com Given my problems with the volume, you can hopefully understand my reservations about calling this a rising wedge. Every wedge I have called since May has met all the above qualifications; I'm not asking for perfection, but to meet what I think are the basic qualifications for the pattern. It's not a subtle distinction; a true rising wedge is very bearish and predicts at best a retest of the lows, and almost always new lows. To call this a wedge ignores some bullish developments over the last month that haven't occurred in previous wedges formed since May.