Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Bring Back SI Bob! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jraz1 who wrote (605)	2/16/2001 12:41:01 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 808

People don't get suspended for disagreeing. They get suspended for violating the TOU. I don't think it's a coincidence that Swisstrader quit posting on the same date and at the same time that his post to Sherry was deleted. I don't know what it said but it must not have been very nice, and frankly, Sherry is too nice of a person to have to put up with abuse.

To: jraz1 who wrote (605)	2/18/2001 5:38:37 PM
From: Rainy_Day_Woman	Respond to of 808

I don't know if he was suspended, nor did I report him, his post or ask that he be suspended someone did pm me the removed post, so I do know the context. he was over of line and the post should have been deleted I don't know the man or his history on SI. I've never posted to him or him to me. but posting a thinly veiled reference to the act of fellatio to any woman on SI is a TOU violation and deserves suspension, IMO I think SI is extraordinarily fair in carrying out TOU violations and dealing with violators I agree. I thoroughly enjoy the a to z personalities on SI this however had nothing to do with 'right' or 'wrong' opinions. it had to do with a TOU violation