SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (127524)2/16/2001 1:11:38 PM
From: fingolfen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
This would indicate that the real speed of P4 is probably closer to 1.2GHz.

You know... this whole exchange just really sounds like the AMD guys have a real case of GHz envy... sad really...



To: Scumbria who wrote (127524)2/16/2001 1:54:54 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Re: "At 95C, parts are typically 20-30% slower than they are at 72C. This would indicate that the real speed of P4 is probably closer to 1.2GHz"

Why? Where does it say you must run a processor at a die temp of 95C? If you can keep the die temp below the spec in a system and your reliability data shows no problems then what is your problem? (Other than that irresistible urge to bash Intel)

EP


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News