SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (127543)2/16/2001 2:21:09 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Re: "You are missing the point. Industries set specs based on economics. Embedded uses 125C because of the requirements for dirt cheap CPUs in automobile engines"

Funny how you keep being wrong and yet others are missing the point. By no means are all embedded devices speced at 125C. Many are speced the same as desktop processors and some lower. I remember hearing about a ultra low power Timna processor for embedded applications that unfortunately never made it to market....

The PC market has not always used 90C.

Re: "Intel is breaking the rules with 72C and 60W, and it is going to cause them serious problems competing vs. AMD, who is playing the game much more conservatively."

While Intel is introducing sub 1W notebook processors, I find it rather funny to hear you saying Intel is going to have trouble competing because of power.

EP



To: Scumbria who wrote (127543)2/17/2001 2:33:08 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
SCUMbria - Re: "The PC industry has always used 90C, "

It has ?

Then why was AMD's case temperature for the K6-2 set at 70C - then 60 C just 2 years ago ?

Paul