Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Think4Yourself who wrote (87585)	2/17/2001 3:44:13 PM
From: Zeuspaul	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 95453

That is exactly the point. 10% is the difference between no alerts and stage 3 rolling blackouts. Maybe in the summer time. California's peak projection for today is 26945 Mw. caiso.com California has existing resources of 59209 Mw (54375Mw if you deduct ISO controlled imports) energy.ca.gov That is a lot closer to fifty percent of capacity and California is in a stage three alert again. 10 percent might make a difference in the summer time peaks. By your logic California would have to cut back 60 percent in the peak summer months to avoid rolling blackouts. Zeuspaul