SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (127752)2/18/2001 5:16:38 PM
From: EricRR  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Is Bill sharpening his wooden stake?

(via JC- jc-news.com )

boards.fool.com

Last week I met with a friend who works for MSFT who I have been discussing AMD with and who was also at a presentation given by Bill G last week.

Apparently Bill G taked about the forthcoming 64 bit processors saying that AMD had a simple and (32 bit) compatible approach to 64-bit while Intel's Itanium had a completely new architecture that would need software to be re-written for it. Bill ended the subject by saying that MSFT will be supporting both processors.

What I got from this snippet was that:-

1. MSFT are aware of the potential difficulties on getting the public to buy a new processor that wouldn't run their existing software. Potentially difficult for MSFT, bad for Intel, and good for AMD.

2. MSFT will be supporting the AMD 64 bit hammer processor. A no-brainer? Probably, but it's nice to have those words come out of Bill G's mouth.



Watch out PaUl! Sarah Michelle Geller is coming for you! (she's carrying a sledgehammer!)

(and don't blabber on about Itanium's hardware compatibility- the question is "compatibility at what level of performance?")