Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (128057)	2/19/2001 5:20:35 PM
From: Little Joe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

"Leonard Garment, William Bradford Reynolds and Lewis Libby" Tiger, the problem with your post is that all of these men were attorneys who represented Marc Rich. They were earning a fee not expressing their personal judgment. For Clinton to say I relied upon that is absurd. He knows that what an attorney may say in the course of representing a client is hardly objective. Little joe

To: TigerPaw who wrote (128057)	2/19/2001 5:21:26 PM
From: willcousa	Respond to of 769667

GET REAL! Those big-time lawyers are not in favor of a pardon for Marc Rich unless they are being paid currently to get it for him. If they were getting paid they would be for it, since they are not they are against it. That's the way it works in Washington.

To: TigerPaw who wrote (128057)	2/20/2001 3:22:53 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

>>The actual lies are by these three men who seize on a narrow technical argument that they did not approve the particular pardon to obscure the fact that they have advocated and written for years that the crimes which were pardoned were not crimes at all. They might as well claim that they had nothing to do with it because they didn't hand Clinton the pen to sign it. The NYTimes went out of their way to show that Clinton lied in their scathing editorial yesterday against Clinton and his insupportable acts.