SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pcstel who wrote (94159)2/21/2001 7:18:56 PM
From: waverider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Good snooping on this pcstel. I have to believe, however, that QCOM felt that the G* system still had a good chance of using those things and that once produced, why not ship them? Anything less would call into question Jacobs' statements about such matters.

A further discussion of this matter would seem prudent.

Rick



To: pcstel who wrote (94159)2/21/2001 8:01:31 PM
From: Pierre  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
Of course.. two quarters later.. They wrote it all off!!! It's all there in the SEC statements

Nice catch, pcstel. You seem to have found another of the permutations to the G* debacle. I admire your ability to read past the numbers.

So tell me, does this put Q* on the hot seat in a G* BK? Still fondling the detonator you so artfully tossed my way.

:>)

Pierre


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News