Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canabrava Diamond -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: whisky who wrote (2230)	2/22/2001 1:53:38 PM
From: m.philli	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2402

thanks, I was thinking of Ontario, (wawa). I also wondered if it could have been a factor in info delay on Kennicott`s part. I agree you usually see a share/net profit when the land is leased. If it was leased form a forestry or railroad etc, I wondered how it might be structured. I wouldn`t expect them to have mineral rights, possibly the railroads would. would this be access right they would have to negotiate only. Makes me wonder, some deals you see have up to 5% but that number may be related to something other than net profit, (net smelter, etc. If we used a number such as 2% net profit to leaseholder, and the lake or the other train source turn out to be something like Ekati mines, we could be talking an amount in the ballpark of the total valuation of CNB. That may be stretching it, but to me is an example of the extreme need for "silence", Until the train source is defined. If the train stopped on land that was not locked up, ouch!