Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Pro Choice Action Team -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (686)	2/26/2001 6:30:47 PM
From: Peter O'Brien	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 948

I'm truly impressed!!! I didn't think liberals had that much spine... After all, it is always the pro-life conservatives who are accused of being so rigid and committed to doctrine. Many conservatives don't want to make any exception (even in the case of rape), and I'm sure you would criticize them for that. Yet, here you are also being just as rigid and inflexible as any Bible-thumping conservative! You just can't admit to any circumstances (however remote) that might challenge your own doctrine that a person's right to their own body is absolute. No exceptions allowed! As I say, I'm truly impressed!

To: epicure who wrote (686)	2/26/2001 6:34:35 PM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 948

We write the laws to protect the greatest number from the greatest harm. HA! More lies. Why should I expect anything else though? Pretty normal. Protect from what? your own selfishness? The numbers of women harmed by the old ""rusty, painted with toxic paint, bent ,coat hangers in the alley"" theory were always lied about. The reason your statement is a lie now is that millions of lives are snuffed out by your protected money whore abortionists. So the greatest number is NOT being protected. Sorry for you.