Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : High Tolerance Plasticity -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jim_p who wrote (429)	2/26/2001 10:41:57 PM
From: Jane4IceCream	Respond to of 23153

Jim, How about.......The Patch......or......The Isolated Patch Jane

To: jim_p who wrote (429)	2/26/2001 10:48:39 PM
From: upanddown	Respond to of 23153

Jim He is the leader and it really should honor him. How about.... "I'm Isopatch and You're Not!" John

To: jim_p who wrote (429)	2/26/2001 11:16:45 PM
From: Winkman777	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 23153

<<Anyone notice the trends over there on Strictly Iso. Iso is now up to posting 45% of all the daily messages, up from 33% yesterday. If the trend continues they will have to rename the thread. Anyone have some good ideas for a new name?>> How about Iso Lonely or maybe Iso Looney? Strictly Isolated? Strictly IsoEgo? (vbg) Great thread - here that is. Thanks all. Winkman

To: jim_p who wrote (429)	2/26/2001 11:45:43 PM
From: kollmhn	Respond to of 23153

I suggest it be renamed from: I-so-patch to: I-so-Lonely and soon to be: I-so-Lated. He will be talking to himself momentarily.....and he will still have NOTHING to say unless Slider comes back from the dead to say it for him. Either way, it won't matter WHAT is said. There IS a reason he only survived six years as a broker. That's how long it takes to convince everyone in Columbus, Ohio that you are an empty suit.

To: jim_p who wrote (429)	2/26/2001 11:50:50 PM
From: upanddown	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 23153

Jim Noticed this line in the APC presentation... media.corporate-ir.net In 2001, new wells in U.S. must produce over 8 bcf/d, annual average, to hold production flat. Is 8 bcf/d even a possibility given reports of new NG wells being significantly less prolific than prior years? Any way to find out statistics on NG well production for this year or prior years? TIA, John

To: jim_p who wrote (429)	2/27/2001 12:18:56 AM
From: ItsAllCyclical	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 23153

OT - New name for the SD thread....Oh the possibilities.... Given Slider, Isobores and Postal's verbal assult the "S&M thread" is probably appropriate or the "I Hate your guts just because you were born thread" or "I know what you're going to trade before you trade it thread" or "I define myself by hating you thread" or "Strictly focusing on your investment track record thread" or "Strictly for Ego-maniacs" or "Isopatch: Experience, Arrogance, or Senility - A study that's sure to bore." ... and on and on and on....