Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: foundation who wrote (94742)	2/27/2001 5:18:06 PM
From: samim anbarcioglu	Respond to of 152472

Ben, >>"...In addition, they will continue to cast as much doubt (on) "the necessity" of Qualcomm IPR..." ------------ It's too late. In this regard, the foundation for your thesis is flawed. >> Why do you say that? Do you think its untrue? Regards, Sam A.

To: foundation who wrote (94742)	2/27/2001 7:39:20 PM
From: pcstel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Benjamin: <It's too late. In this regard, the foundation for your thesis is flawed.> You might want to tell R. Sulpizio that. He went on and on this morning about how he keeps trying to beat his story of "Qualcomm holds essential IPR for WCDMA, and will paid the same royalty rate for WCDMA and CDMA2000"..into '" If my thesis was flawed.. Then R. Sulpizio would not have to try and "beat his story" in to analyst's.. They would already understand it!! Look at the EAnywhere series of License Agreements November, 2000 qualcomm.com Twelve Weeks later they now decide they need a 3G license agreement? This is Press Release fluffery!! And in all of these "3G Upgraded license agreements Press Releases it reads "This agreement with (Insert Company Name Here) illustrates yet again the applicability of QUALCOMM's patent portfolio to all third-generation CDMA systems." PCSTEL