Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (72741)	2/27/2001 10:07:37 PM
From: IceShark	Respond to of 436258

I just heard the tail end of that. I told you he would propose it. Regarding the 2%, I thought that was related to how much of the contribution could be dumped in. Not 2% of the total, but 2 of the percents withheld and maybe the matched. Pretty vague, but it is on the table. I'm not so sure what the heck happens now, as if funds flow out of T's maybe they get replaced by fund flows out of stocks into T's. In any event, it will be an excuse to ramp the market, as expected. -ng-

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (72741)	2/27/2001 11:01:05 PM
From: Les H	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 436258

That's 2% of the 12+% that's currently withheld. I wonder how that county in Texas is doing with their Social Security opt-out investment plan. A year or more ago, they were boasting about people retiring early.