Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (7121)	3/2/2001 11:07:14 AM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 82486

It actually does not push the question up at all. Obviously, only an uncreated being, such as is argued for by some philosophers, could be responsible for creation. The rest is theology, and need not be addressed in this context.....

To: E who wrote (7121)	3/2/2001 11:44:01 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I won't be around later today, or tonight. Oh, no. What shall we do without you? Pure faith may be a better way to go with fundamentally flawed proposals at "explanation" in the long run. I think it's a smart move on their part. Creationism is a real loser and they have to learn to throw their conspicuous losers overboard to have any chance to increase their constituency. IDT does not immediately give off that fishy smell. Our education system isn't producing enough of what it takes to analyze something like this for flaws. My fence sitting is a debate over what is in the best interests of society. I have no doubt that the best interest of society lies in eschewing superstition and improving critical thinking. I don't know whether IDT is a glass half full or half empty. Karen