Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (133930)	3/2/2001 2:23:11 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1570652

Ted, <Are you basing your call of Clinton's lack of morality on the screaming heard from the media or on the facts.> I base it on Clinton's own words and actions. Skirting the boundary between what is legal and what is not what I'd call moral or ethical. Redefining the definition of the word "is" or the definition of "sexual relations" just to weasel out of legal trouble is not what I'd call moral or ethical. And tossing out pardons based on personal or family donations or political posturing is not what I'd moral or ethical. Anyone can defend Clinton on the basis of "Well, we don't know what exactly he was thinking, so we can't judge," or "Other politicans are no better." But that sort of defense only lowers the standard, not raise Clinton up. And it's a crying shame when even Biblical passages are taken out-of-context to lower our own standard of ethics or raise our tolerance of injustice and corruption. Tenchusatsu