Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SONS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: danofthebes who wrote (67)	5/6/2001 1:40:13 AM
From: Theophile	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575

dothvs....I believe you are focusing on the same area I am looking at, but I am a network investor, not a fiber gear sector investor. I don't want to intrude here, but I think this is part of the vindication of our seemingly similar focus: JNPR and SONS alliance...... I follow GX closely, and the same day as the JNPR//SONS alliance was announced, GX announced they were buying the 1200 series of routers from CSCO. biz.yahoo.com This would not seem important, but heretofore GX has used JNPR gear. Their rationale for choosing CSCO was due to a single item of functionality (so they say), and this is "guaranteed high priority packet delivery" available on CSCO product, but not available from any other vendor. Can someone here direct me to information WRT the JNPR or SONS products which might compete with the CSCO products? I have been all over the various homepages for the software plays (Packeteer et.al.) and SONS and JNPR, and nowhere can I find anyone guraranteeing the delivery of high priority packets, except CSCO. I feel the JNPR//SONS announcement was in response to the GX//CSCO deal, and I would like very much to follow this to completion. With all of the pressure on the gear makers due to lowered telecom capex, I expect only the high margin network offerings will be receiving substantial capex, and this would be the areas of VoIP, Video, etc, all involving the need for guaranteed delivery of the high priority packets over any IP system. This would suggest this area will be the focus of the gear makers. Any help would be appreciated. Martin Thomas