SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (30114)3/2/2001 7:40:14 PM
From: andreas_wonischRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Joe, Re: , If the clock is 50% faster (as in PC-150) the latency is lower, 1/1.5 = 66% of the latency of PC-100.

Thanks for your answer, that makes sense now and explains the surprisingly good benchmark scores with PC150. Concerning AMD760 and PowerNow: Unfortunately there's no trace of it. The only thing I noticed on most boards is the fact that their third (and sometimes fourth) DIMM slot was apparently removed in a last minute decision: You can still see the soldering points on the board. Even the MSI board comes with only two slots now (I think they had four on their homepage; Edit: That's still the case: msi-technology.de. This could explain the delay of the boards.

Andreas



To: Joe NYC who wrote (30114)3/2/2001 7:49:06 PM
From: fyodor_Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Joe: My guess is that the latency of PC1600 DDR CL2 is approximately the same as PC-100 CL2 SDR, If the clock is 50% faster (as in PC-150) the latency is lower, 1/1.5 = 66% of the latency of PC-100.

Your "guess" is 100% spot on ;)

-fyo


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News