SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (119405)3/5/2001 8:46:59 PM
From: manalagi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Victor:

I am not taking issue with the right for gun ownership. Of course anything sharp or hard (a hammer, a brick) can kill a person. But it does not have the impact of an assault weapon which in an instance can takes so many lives. As I posted earlier: in foreign countries, the victims are people who the killer(s) hates. In our schools or post offices, the victims were those who happened to be in the vicinity.



To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (119405)3/6/2001 9:23:10 AM
From: microhoogle!  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
Victor,
Guns are too easily available to people who should not be having them. On top of that, their use is glorified in movies and video/simulation games. All it takes is a gentle nudge on the trigger for disasterous consequences that cannot be undone.
I believe (potential) victims rights should outweigh (potential) perpetrators rights.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News