Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (129214)	3/5/2001 9:23:45 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: "Need you be reminded that more than 70 million dollars was spent by Ken Starr alone to try to find something on Clinton and all that you got him on was a extra-marital sex charge about which he lied" This is nonsense. First off, the $70 million pales compared to the Iran-Contra investigation spending and no one ever got Ronnie and that $70 million is largely fixed costs that would have been spent anyway, just on something else. Something like 12 convictions resulted from that investigation. That's not insignificant.

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (129214)	3/5/2001 11:04:36 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

JF, Re: "Presiding over good economy as a counterbalance to being a rapist." The allegation of rape is mild compared to the many others people of your ilk have leveled at Clinton, e.g. murder. I thought you were going to explain me your the balance sheet. If the economy is good under W., does he get a pass on one rape? Also, I'd like to hear you respond to the rape story about Reagan that you just informed about. Good economy DR One rape CR That's how it works, right? Joe