SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Systems, Strategies and Resources for Trading Futures -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: anon who wrote (44107)3/8/2001 12:38:30 PM
From: Patrick Slevin  Respond to of 44573
 
Perhaps either people will not admit to it because either

1) Delta was slammed hard in the press some 15 or so years ago as being too off-the-beaten path. Akin to Astro-trading and the like. If you look around, not many people will admit to Astro-trading either. The ones that do, are way out there. Type of guy you would not want to marry into your family. I admit to using it to some extent, merely because of repeatable patterns that occur at certain times of the year. Heck, if it can be shown to be repeatable then I would not care if it involved reading tea leaves in a cup.

Wilder contributed to this impression (and a fair blot on his reputation) by trying to prove it's worth, predicting something which failed miserably.

or,

2) It works so well that people don't want you to know about it. Unlikely, I would think.

--------

I, too, found Larsen's work a bit confusing. I have no knowledge of Astro or the way he applies it. I showed his work to my wife, who is a competent astrologer (or at least I think so, but then how would I know), and she said his analysis was very accurate. Also, he told me that an understanding of Astro is not necessary. My problem with all of that is I like to know how the system works and not have a black box. Anyway, it appears that neither Delta nor Chaos have much good to say about one another.

By the way, there was a brief discussion on the Gann thread recently about Delta if you would like to read it. I don't recall there was much said, just questions about it. But the two or three people who posted may be willing to pursue the conversation with you.