Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: russwinter who wrote (65108)	3/8/2001 9:43:40 AM
From: TrueScouse	Respond to of 116874

Russ: Thanks for posting the URL for Metallica's PR. Excellent news! Regards, Howy

To: russwinter who wrote (65108)	3/8/2001 12:47:53 PM
From: TheBusDriver	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116874

METLF is an old favorite of mine as well...afraid this caught me napping! Gold is looking serious this afternoon! wayne

To: russwinter who wrote (65108)	3/8/2001 2:20:36 PM
From: goldsheet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116874

> I guess it is my private little secret, but let's look at the case of Metallica (MR) Some of us know and follow Metallica and like their Cerro San Pedro gold-silver deposit (JV with Glamis, which we both like) > If you have even elementary knowledge about deposits, what's so tough about analyzing this one? I saw .72% CU and .54GPT AU and .61% CU and .58GPT AU, both over long intercepts (very nice for a porphyry copper deposit) My elementary knowledge of math tells me that is about $120 of CU and $5 of AU per ton (aka a COPPER MINE) with a tiny amount of gold byproduct. It seems reasonable to me that gold investors would miss the importance of the results. Obviously Noranda did not miss it and has an option for 70%. Again, gold investors probably do not follow Noranda (I do) REF: metal-res.com