SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Home on the range where the buffalo roam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sam Sara who wrote (11394)3/9/2001 5:20:59 PM
From: Hobie1Kenobe  Respond to of 13572
 
Sam - Not very many people seem willing to confront the issue that many tech stocks carrying huge inventories of unsellable products may actually report losses ( Less than zero growth) in 2001. Should make comps in 2002-3 look pretty good. When EPS growth goes negative (instead of just decelerating) valuing these stocks becomes much more problematic. Waiting for the bounce (from where I know not), but intending to continue riding this market up and down long and short.
Best,
JF3



To: Sam Sara who wrote (11394)3/9/2001 5:38:37 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 13572
 
Sam, I have not become a permabull.
I hope we have an option manipulation runup, by no means certain, and I bail on that if we do. Planned exit is thursday. Zeev thinks this rally lasts all mont but I I get a piece of it and make a deecent profit (or any profit) I will be happy.

I will not go short in front of FOMC.
I hope the heck they rally IBM back to 106 as I will go nuclear short on it.

M



To: Sam Sara who wrote (11394)3/9/2001 6:35:38 PM
From: Boplicity  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13572
 
1000 is ridiculous. Why not 500? geez!

Greg