Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (10669)	3/11/2001 2:34:35 AM
From: elmatador	Respond to of 12823

SI Jeff, Is it allowed? I think this uncalled for ofense calls for at least one week ban!

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (10669)	3/11/2001 4:33:37 AM
From: elmatador	Respond to of 12823

To:mindmeld who wrote (49755) From: SI Admin (Jeff) Saturday, Mar 10, 2001 3:39 PM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 49799 Thread! Please remember as I stated last week, that we are trying to remain civil in this thread. As volatile as this market can be personal attacks can be considered a TOU violation. I again, ask for your continued cooperation in this! Jeff This was posted in the CSCO Thread. It must e valid here as well, Maurice.

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (10669)	3/12/2001 8:55:46 AM
From: MikeM54321	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12823

"Now, Motorola and Ericy are similar in market capitalisation to Q! and Nokia then was smaller than Q!" Maurice- QCOM Sales-$2.7 Billion / Cap-$39.1 billion MOT Sales-$37.6 billion / Cap-$34.0 billion ERICY Sales-$30.9 billion / Cap-$65.6 billion NOK Sales Sales-$28.3 billion / Cap-$106.9 billion NT Sales-$30.3 billion / Cap-$54.7 billion LU Sales-$31.6 billion / Cap-$42.0 billion So I take it you don't feel QCOM's valuation is quite lofty compared to other mid-large cap equipment companies. Just a quick glance at QCOM's trailing twelve months column and one can see it's just no where near it's peers. Yet, as you point out, market cap is in ball park of those peers. As I recall (and I could be mistaken) you seem to think highly of QCOM's future value. In that respect what year do you estimate QCOM's ttm to be in the ballpark of the peers you mention? Or is there some other valuation method you are using that shows QCOM may be undervalued today? Thanks. -MikeM(From Florida)