Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Silicon Investor ThinkTank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: thecow who wrote (2434)	3/10/2001 8:20:36 PM
From: Kayaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3372

I contacted RoadRunner about the difficulties with SI and they checked their routing and SI's cable servers are having problems. It's been this way for several days for me and I have emailed SI with tracert and ping info. Probably not what you want to hear, but I'm using cable (Shaw, Vancouver Island) and have had no problems with SI over the past several days. No noticeable slowdown.

To: thecow who wrote (2434)	3/10/2001 8:21:12 PM
From: AugustWest	Respond to of 3372

tc, don't know how the speed is on your end, but if I do subject searches they are coming back pretty fast right now. As far as loading my bookmarks pages, forget it. I have to make a mental note of about five or 6 of them than just do the subject search to get to 'em. Oh, and just forget about accessing your outbox. Guess this is part of the cutting back thing insp is going through. I think I'd rather have speed than SI Jeff- no offense Jeff, I'd just like to be able to load messages faster than I can read them.

To: thecow who wrote (2434)	3/10/2001 9:58:03 PM
From: Ed Forrest	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3372

I contacted RoadRunner about the difficulties with SI and they checked their routing and SI's cable servers are having problems. TC I have DSL and I have had no difficulty with SI the past few days. A while back I had some general latency issues and my ISP SWB stated that after x number of hops(3 I believe) out they no longer have responsibility for latency. What I am gathering from your post is that Roadrunner is assuming responsibility all the way to SI. If that is so then that information would be helpful the next time a problem with SWB arises. Ed