Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BigShoulders who wrote (12896)	3/11/2001 12:21:33 AM
From: Chris J. Horne	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 42834

"Q's were in the 70's when Bob issued the bulletin in October to buy Q's for the counter trend rally" Bull! They were at 83.

To: BigShoulders who wrote (12896)	3/11/2001 2:32:27 AM
From: geode00	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42834

My buy at 43 wasn't filled. Barrons's shows the low for the week at 44.95 I have a low on Friday of 42.20. It that's proven to be wrong, I'll concede that point with no problem. After the huge drop, a few points will make ZERO difference. If you're defending Bob, why are you buying at 43 instead of 73? Don't you listen when he dresses down callers who don't act when he tells them to and who later lament that fact? Q's were in the 70's when Bob issued the bulletin in October to buy Q's for the counter trend rally QQQs were incredibly volatile. I have a range of somewhere around 74 to somewhere above 86 in the week of 10/16. When was the bulletin issued? It is undated. Some people get their mail from him in 2 days, others get it much later. If you don't have access to the net or historical charts, how do you know what the recent closing lows were? Do you have to guess? Why wasn't a price range simply printed. It would have taken Bob 5 minutes to do that simple thing. No one is ever 100% right in the stock market. I would be happy with 70% Nope, wrong topic. I was talking about the critics who warned and are still warning about Bob and his trades. They have been proven right. Of course no one is 100% right, that is patently obvious. No one faults Bob for being wrong like every other human being. Have you actually been following this argument? The recommended October trade has been conceded to have been a bad call. The jury is still out on the January recommendation. Total baloney. The October trade is still on. Bob has not given a sell call on that one. It's down, it's out but he has not conceded it. That is simply wrong and incredibly misleading.