Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Machaon who wrote (131317)	3/12/2001 12:36:47 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

duhhhhh Robert Barry says.. If it can be proved that sexuality is not 100% male or female, then a lot of religions would be based on faulty premises. Barry boy, all that statement proves is that you have no understanding of religious beliefs and teaching. duhhhhh Robert Barry says..or instance, some are born with combinations of both male and female anatomy. According to some religious beliefs, this is impossible. Barry boy, all that statement proves is that you have no understanding of anything. duhhhhh Robert Barry says.s a person who has a part female, part male anatomy gay? How about someone who is born 90% male and 10% female? Barry boy, all that statement proves is that as you have no understanding of anything simple it would be impossible to think you could understand percentages. Of these conclusions I am 100% certain. Does anybody know who has the gene for stupid. Is it true that it's called the democrat gene????? tom watson tosiwmee

To: Machaon who wrote (131317)	3/12/2001 1:08:56 PM
From: Little Joe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Robert: "This is an important question. If it can be proved that sexuality is not 100% male or female, then a lot of religions would be based on faulty premises." I don't argue the importance of the question, but I have never heard anyone even try to answer it. It seems to me unlikely that there is a gene which causes people to be gay as we know there are many bi-sexuals. All of those who propose this argument avoid this question. I do not ask this question as gay bashing. What one does with their life should be their business as long as they do not harm me. However, given the significant medical issues involved we should not be making public policy without understanding the nature of the problem we are dealing with. Little joe