SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (129828)3/12/2001 1:16:10 PM
From: Bob Kim  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
How about those IBM dual-Athlon machines?

Following Osha's logic from last week's WSJ, this news should be a negative for AMD.

"Analyst Joe Osha at Merrill Lynch & Co. said AMD is a more attractive investment than Intel this year because AMD is focused on the consumer and low-end markets, which are doing well, especially in Asia. And AMD's failure to make inroads into the more lucrative server markets and U.S. corporate PCs is actually helping it now that demand in those markets is falling off."



To: Scumbria who wrote (129828)3/12/2001 1:28:40 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Scumbria, <The AMD roadmap sounds pretty much like Dirk described in June, 1999.>

You're wrong. Whatever happened to:

1) 8-way SMP
2) Mustang
3) 8M L2 caches (AMDroids were drooling over this possibility, not realizing it was just a neato Powerpoint filler)
4) Brand names: Athlon Ultra, Athlon Select, Athlon Professional
5) RISC-like FPU in K8 (as opposed to cloning SSE2)

IIRC, all these were things that AMD all but promised back in 1999, but fell off the roadmap during the course of 2000.

<How about those IBM dual-Athlon machines?>

Sounds like an excellent design win for AMD. I expected a few non-Tier 1 OEM wins, but the rumor of the IBM win this early took me by surprise.

Too bad the price of AMD stock still hasn't reflected the rumor.

Tenchusatsu